With a caveat · AGI
redJ on AGI
Said
“we have AGI. our best models pass the turing test, this is AGI.”
The @sudoredj account argues that passing the Turing test is sufficient to call current models AGI and asks for different terminology for stronger requirements. The arrival claim depends on that definition; no particular model is named.
Source notes
Discovered through public archives and checked against X’s official public oEmbed. Author, post ID and visible wording verified; UTC publication date decoded from the post ID. This records the speaker’s view, not the archive’s assessment of AGI.