With a caveat · AGI
Ethan Mollick on AGI
Said
“I really don’t know, but I do think they can be credibly seen as a form of “Jagged AGI””
Asked within his essay whether o3 and Gemini 2.5 are AGI, Mollick explicitly says he does not know because of definitional problems, then proposes the qualified phrase “Jagged AGI.” He emphasizes uneven capabilities and continuing need for human expertise. The uncertainty remains in the excerpt.
- Model / system named
- o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Original terminology
- Jagged AGI
Source notes
Exact excerpt, author and publication timestamp verified through the publication’s own public post API. The original essay supplies both the AGI qualification and the named models.